SIMULATION STUDIES OF HEURISTIC APPROACHES FOR DYNAMIC SCHEDULING OF CONTAINER TERMINAL OPERATIONS

H.-L. Zhang and Z.-B. Jiang

References

  1. [1] C.F. Daganazo, The productivity of multipurpose seaport ter-minal, Transportation Science, 24(3), 1993, 205–216.
  2. [2] R.I. Peterkosky & C.F. Daganzo, A branch and bound solu-tion method for the crane scheduling problem, TransportationResearch B, 24, 1990, 159–172.
  3. [3] S. Hartmann, A general framework for scheduling equipmentand manpower at container terminal, OR Spectrum, 26, 2004,51–74.
  4. [4] K. Hwan Kim & Y.M. Park, A crane scheduling method forcontainer terminals, European Journal of Operational Research,156, 2004, 752–768.
  5. [5] I.F.A. Vis & R. de Koster, Transshipment of containers at a con-tainer terminal: An overview, European Journal of OperationalResearch, 147, 2003, 1–16.
  6. [6] F.T.S. Chan, H.K. Chan, H.C.W. Lau, & R.W.L. Ip, Analysis ofdynamic dispatching rules for a flexible manufacturing system,Journal of Materials Processing technology, 138, 2003, 325–331.
  7. [7] N.R. Adam, J.W.M. Bertrand, & J. Surkis, Priority assignmentprocedures in multi-level assembly job shops, IIE Transactions,19, 1987, 317–329.
  8. [8] E. Kozan, Comparison of analytical and simulation planningmodels of seaport container terminals, Transportation Planningand Technology, 20(3), 1997, 235–248.

Important Links:

Go Back